Poesis
Usage / Use case Partial
Review candidates from selected sources
Compare code-derived and delivery-derived candidates against their pinned source evidence, retain competing contributions and acquisition gaps, and select what may proceed to draft review. Confidence does not settle truth or establish deployed reality.
Platform / Ops / SRE lead / Authorized integration client / Enterprise Architect
Platform
What serves this use case
Affordances
Values
Values composed with this use case
- Value Partial
Inspect acquisition scope and freshness
Distinguish inspected revisions from missing, failed or stale collection before relying on source evidence.
Supported by Affordances(1)
Supported by Capabilities(1)
Supported by Features(2)
Realized through Use cases(6)
- Value Partial
Give AI attributable context.
Ground planned read-only answers in authorized, versioned definitions, with citations and abstention for review. Build that context through direct authoring or reviewed sourcing.
Supported by Affordances(1)
Supported by Capabilities(2)
Supported by Features(1)
- Value Partial
Separate exploration from acceptance.
Collect candidates on the board, reconcile them in a client and govern promoted drafts in the Definition Manager through an explicit integration handoff.
Supported by Affordances(1)
Supported by Capabilities(2)
Supported by Features(1)
Pains
Pain points
- Pain point Partial
Collection scope, incomplete runs and stale evidence are mistaken for current coverage.
Reviews rely on uninspected or outdated inputs and repeat work when collection failures emerge late.
Addressed by Affordances(1)
Addressed by Capabilities(1)
Addressed by Features(2)
Experienced by Actor types(4)
Addressed through Use cases(6)
- Pain point Partial
The architecture repository is out of date the day it’s written.
Hand-maintained models detach from the territory the moment delivery moves on — and every decision made on them inherits the drift.
Addressed by Affordances(1)
Addressed by Capabilities(3)
Addressed by Features(2)
Experienced by Actor types(4)
Addressed through Use cases(7)
- Author and approve a shared definition
- Reconcile code evidence into reviewed definitions
- React to a committed definition change
- Extract definition candidates from a code revision
- Source IT definitions from inspected evidence
- Hold definitions as the authoritative, revision-bound source
- Review candidates from selected sources
- Pain point Partial
Governance drifts from what actually runs.
The declared estate and the running estate diverge silently — until an audit or an incident exposes the gap.
Addressed by Affordances(1)
Addressed by Capabilities(3)
Addressed by Features(3)
Experienced by Actor types(6)
Addressed through Use cases(8)
- Set and review evidence-refresh expectations
- Reconcile code evidence into reviewed definitions
- Review recurring patient-portal appraisal
- Submit a contribution to a declared panel
- Close a contribution collection for review
- Collect competing contributions on a shared blackboard
- Obtain a reproducible verdict for supplied inputs
- Review candidates from selected sources