Poesis
Usage / Use case Implemented
Submit a contribution to a declared panel
Post a candidate to a declared panel and inspect schema, identity, confidence-envelope and rejection responses under the client/server contract. Acceptance into collection is not definition approval.
Platform
What serves this use case
Features
Values
Values composed with this use case
- Value Partial
Compare contributed partial views.
Bring conflicting candidates into shared panels so reviewers can compare evidence and identify gaps in the collected views.
Supported by Affordances(1)
Supported by Capabilities(2)
Supported by Features(1)
Pains
Pain points
- Pain point Partial
Governance drifts from what actually runs.
The declared estate and the running estate diverge silently — until an audit or an incident exposes the gap.
Addressed by Affordances(1)
Addressed by Capabilities(3)
Addressed by Features(3)
Experienced by Actor types(6)
Addressed through Use cases(8)
- Set and review evidence-refresh expectations
- Reconcile code evidence into reviewed definitions
- Review recurring patient-portal appraisal
- Submit a contribution to a declared panel
- Close a contribution collection for review
- Collect competing contributions on a shared blackboard
- Obtain a reproducible verdict for supplied inputs
- Review candidates from selected sources