Poesis
Usage / Use case Partial
Reconcile code evidence into reviewed definitions
Turn competing source-revision candidates into attributable definition drafts for review.
Enterprise Architect / Platform / Ops / SRE lead / Authorized integration client
Platform
What serves this use case
Affordances
Values
Values composed with this use case
- Value Partial
Keep governance closer to its evidence.
Bring shared definitions, reviewed candidates and scoped appraisal together to simplify reconciliation. For running systems, keep observation coverage and freshness visible.
Supported by Affordances(2)
Supported by Capabilities(2)
- Value Partial
Give AI attributable context.
Ground planned read-only answers in authorized, versioned definitions, with citations and abstention for review. Build that context through direct authoring or reviewed sourcing.
Supported by Affordances(1)
Supported by Capabilities(2)
Supported by Features(1)
- Value Partial
Reduce manual candidate authoring.
Prepare proposals through staged analysis and optional inference so experts can focus on reconciliation and acceptance.
Supported by Affordances(1)
Supported by Features(1)
- Value Partial
Relate definitions to inspected revisions.
Reconcile definitions against pinned source evidence. Relating them to running systems additionally requires deployed identity, configuration and fresh observations.
Supported by Affordances(1)
Supported by Features(1)
Realized through Use cases(2)
- Value Partial
Inspect the basis of proposals.
Review provenance and confidence alongside retained tool details, source revisions and competing evidence.
Supported by Affordances(1)
Realized through Use cases(1)
- Value Partial
Use evidence to inform revisions.
Carry reviewed candidates into authorized revisions with promotion lineage. Collection, approval and confirmation against running systems remain distinct steps.
Supported by Affordances(1)
Supported by Capabilities(1)
Realized through Use cases(2)
- Value Partial
Compare contributed partial views.
Bring conflicting candidates into shared panels so reviewers can compare evidence and identify gaps in the collected views.
Supported by Affordances(1)
Supported by Capabilities(2)
Supported by Features(1)
- Value Partial
Separate exploration from acceptance.
Collect candidates on the board, reconcile them in a client and govern promoted drafts in the Definition Manager through an explicit integration handoff.
Supported by Affordances(1)
Supported by Capabilities(2)
Supported by Features(1)
- Value Partial
Trace retained proposal evidence.
Revisit captured actors and sources, with reducer decisions and Ascription links extending the trail from proposal to accepted definition.
Supported by Affordances(1)
Supported by Capabilities(1)
Supported by Features(2)
Pains
Pain points
- Pain point Partial
The architecture repository is out of date the day it’s written.
Hand-maintained models detach from the territory the moment delivery moves on — and every decision made on them inherits the drift.
Addressed by Affordances(1)
Addressed by Capabilities(3)
Addressed by Features(2)
Experienced by Actor types(4)
Addressed through Use cases(7)
- Author and approve a shared definition
- Reconcile code evidence into reviewed definitions
- React to a committed definition change
- Extract definition candidates from a code revision
- Source IT definitions from inspected evidence
- Hold definitions as the authoritative, revision-bound source
- Review candidates from selected sources
- Pain point Partial
Governance drifts from what actually runs.
The declared estate and the running estate diverge silently — until an audit or an incident exposes the gap.
Addressed by Affordances(1)
Addressed by Capabilities(3)
Addressed by Features(3)
Experienced by Actor types(6)
Addressed through Use cases(8)
- Set and review evidence-refresh expectations
- Reconcile code evidence into reviewed definitions
- Review recurring patient-portal appraisal
- Submit a contribution to a declared panel
- Close a contribution collection for review
- Collect competing contributions on a shared blackboard
- Obtain a reproducible verdict for supplied inputs
- Review candidates from selected sources