Usage / Use case Planned
React to a committed definition change
Refresh a downstream view from committed changes without repeated full polling.
Platform
What serves this use case
Features
Values
Values composed with this use case
- Value Partial
Build toward bounded feedback loops.
Connect definitions, observations, evaluation, authorized response and re-observation in future domain-specific loops, with explicit boundaries for each integration.
Supported by Capabilities(1)
Supported by Features(2)
- Value Partial
React to committed changes.
Use planned change notifications to replace repeated polling, with replay and recovery for missed events.
Supported by Capabilities(1)
Supported by Features(1)
Realized through Use cases(2)
Pains
Pain points
- Pain point Partial
The architecture repository is out of date the day it’s written.
Hand-maintained models detach from the territory the moment delivery moves on — and every decision made on them inherits the drift.
Addressed by Affordances(1)
Addressed by Capabilities(3)
Addressed by Features(2)
Experienced by Actor types(4)
Addressed through Use cases(7)
- Author and approve a shared definition
- Reconcile code evidence into reviewed definitions
- React to a committed definition change
- Extract definition candidates from a code revision
- Source IT definitions from inspected evidence
- Hold definitions as the authoritative, revision-bound source
- Review candidates from selected sources