Poesis
Usage / Use case Partial
Obtain a reproducible verdict for supplied inputs
Select coherent definition revisions through the API, supply pinned inputs and Norms to evaluation, and compare verdicts across rule revisions with explicit applicability and unknown states. Repeatability applies to identical evaluation inputs, not changing live systems.
Assessment runner / Platform / Ops / SRE lead / Authorized integration client
Platform
What serves this use case
Capabilities
Values
Values composed with this use case
- Value Partial
Understand verdict changes before rule adoption
Compare rule revisions on pinned reference inputs and inspect changed and unknown results before accepting their effect on decisions.
Supported by Capabilities(1)
Supported by Features(1)
Realized through Use cases(2)
- Value Partial
Make pure verdicts reproducible.
Replay planned pure evaluations against pinned rules, inputs and time, independently of effectful execution.
Supported by Affordances(1)
Supported by Capabilities(1)
Supported by Features(2)
- Value Partial
Identify the snapshot used.
Trace execution to requested definition IDs. Coherent pinning will distinguish latest, historical and eligible snapshot policies explicitly.
Supported by Capabilities(1)
Supported by Features(2)
Pains
Pain points
- Pain point Partial
A rule revision changes established verdicts without an inspected explanation.
New false positives, missed violations and unknown outcomes alter decisions before their causes are understood.
Addressed by Capabilities(1)
Addressed by Features(1)
Experienced by Actor types(5)
Addressed through Use cases(2)
- Pain point Partial
Governance drifts from what actually runs.
The declared estate and the running estate diverge silently — until an audit or an incident exposes the gap.
Addressed by Affordances(1)
Addressed by Capabilities(3)
Addressed by Features(3)
Experienced by Actor types(6)
Addressed through Use cases(8)
- Set and review evidence-refresh expectations
- Reconcile code evidence into reviewed definitions
- Review recurring patient-portal appraisal
- Submit a contribution to a declared panel
- Close a contribution collection for review
- Collect competing contributions on a shared blackboard
- Obtain a reproducible verdict for supplied inputs
- Review candidates from selected sources