Poesis
Usage / Use case Partial
Take a modeling limit through research to a decision
Trace a modeling limit through hypotheses, cases and recorded decisions, identify missing discriminating evidence and prepare a compatibility-aware Change Proposal where warranted. A research record is not an accepted model change or proof that an experiment ran.
Platform
What serves this use case
Capabilities
Values
Values composed with this use case
- Value Partial
Build toward neutral stewardship.
Pursue consortium stewardship through a visible model and reviewed evolution, with ownership, licensing and publication stated separately.
Supported by Capabilities(1)
Supported by Features(6)
- Value Partial
Challenge assumptions explicitly.
Compare alternative explanations through research records and cases, distinguishing conceptual exploration from executed testing.
Supported by Capabilities(1)
Supported by Features(6)
- Value Partial
Separate hypotheses from requirements.
Keep exploratory records separate from normative requirements and promote findings through specification governance.
Supported by Capabilities(1)
Supported by Features(5)
Pains
Pain points
- Pain point Partial
A modeling decision cites an example as though it were an executed test.
A reviewer cannot distinguish a plausible explanation from evidence that rules out alternatives.
Addressed by Capabilities(1)
Addressed by Features(6)
Experienced by Actor types(2)