Poesis
Usage / Use case Planned
Incorporate an accepted grammar extension
Incorporate an approved grammar change with explicit compatibility and migration boundaries.
Platform
What serves this use case
Features
Values
Values composed with this use case
- Value Partial
Adapt grammar through evidence.
Address demonstrated modeling limits through planned, reviewed extensions with explicit compatibility decisions.
Supported by Capabilities(1)
Supported by Features(4)
- Value Partial
Separate hypotheses from requirements.
Keep exploratory records separate from normative requirements and promote findings through specification governance.
Supported by Capabilities(1)
Supported by Features(5)
Pains
Pain points
- Pain point Partial
Architecture, compliance, and quality tools don’t speak to each other.
Each tool keeps its own model of the same IT reality; integrations are bespoke mappings that rot, and knowledge stays siloed per tool and per team.
Addressed by Affordances(1)
Addressed by Capabilities(6)
Addressed by Features(17)
Experienced by Actor types(9)
Addressed through Use cases(16)
- Inspect one subject across framework perspectives
- Agree a reusable domain typing contract
- Qualify transfer between independent processors
- Read and model a governance decision
- Describe a service contract and its attribution
- Describe payment request and notification boundaries
- Describe payment settlement and recovery boundaries
- Incorporate an accepted grammar extension
- Read and revise definitions through the API
- Qualify an execution adapter for an integration
- Maintain a governed IT definition inventory
- Type a governance concern with the systemic primitives
- Define a domain vocabulary as an Archetype
- Express an obligation in the governance grammar
- Describe an interaction with sourced protocol vocabulary
- Work from shared, typed definitions