Usage / Use case Planned
Identify gaps in selected vocabulary coverage
Compare selected vocabulary against an explicit subject and concern inventory, exposing uncovered areas without claiming legal completeness.
Platform
What serves this use case
Features
Values
Values composed with this use case
- Value Partial
Make obligation applicability explicit
Separate reusable templates and vocabulary coverage from the subjects, conditions and accountable interpretation that establish applicable obligations.
Supported by Affordances(1)
Supported by Capabilities(1)
Supported by Features(1)
- Value Partial
Inspect source mappings.
Review concepts in the source taxonomy with available clause references, checking coverage and legal applicability for your scope.
Supported by Capabilities(1)
Supported by Features(7)
Pains
Pain points
- Pain point Partial
Selected vocabulary and unbound templates are mistaken for complete, applicable obligations.
Subjects or concerns are omitted and requirements are applied without a justified adopting scope.
Addressed by Affordances(1)
Addressed by Capabilities(2)
Addressed by Features(7)
Experienced by Actor types(5)
Addressed through Use cases(6)