Poesis
Usage / Use case Planned
Generate and review an architecture decision pack
Assemble an ADR pack and evidence summary from the same pinned inputs, then review the substantive result.
Platform
What serves this use case
Features
Values
Values composed with this use case
- Value Partial
Reduce avoidable reconstruction and rework
Reuse shared context and generated artifacts so effort can shift from repeated assembly to curation and review. Net savings depend on the workflow and compute costs.
Supported by Capabilities(2)
Supported by Features(1)
- Value Planned
Coordinate IT work around shared definitions.
Reuse common inputs across appraisal, analysis and document generation so profiles can review decisions against the same definitions. Outputs and scenarios remain subject to review.
Supported by Capabilities(1)
Supported by Features(3)
- Value Planned
Reduce repeated document assembly.
Generate reviewable document families from reusable definitions and templates, then focus effort on review, correction and template upkeep.
Supported by Capabilities(1)
Supported by Features(1)
Pains
Pain points
- Pain point Partial
Every deliverable is hand-crafted, again and again.
ADR packs, evidence, baselines, and roadmaps are rebuilt by hand — and stale against each other by the time they ship.
Addressed by Affordances(1)
Addressed by Capabilities(2)
Addressed by Features(2)
Experienced by Actor types(7)
Addressed through Use cases(8)
- Author and maintain reusable output bindings
- Operate recurring report production
- Generate and review an architecture decision pack
- Reuse captured delivery evidence as definition proposals
- Extract definition candidates from delivery history
- Produce a named IT document family from pinned definitions
- Turn delivery history into definition candidates
- Generate artifacts through declared workflows